Legal Counsel You Can Rely On

For individuals with substantial net worth, strategic estate planning is crucial to effectively mitigate or even eliminate transfer tax liabilities. While a multitude of options exist, this document outlines several highly favored methods designed to maximize wealth preservation across generations. The optimal solution is highly individualized and necessitates tailored professional guidance. The strategies presented below illustrate powerful techniques for achieving significant tax efficiencies within a comprehensive estate plan.

An Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust (ILIT) is an irrevocable trust established to own a life insurance policy. By having the ILIT own the policy, the death benefit is generally excluded from the insured's gross estate for federal estate tax purposes under IRC Section 2042. This is a significant advantage, as direct ownership by an individual would typically lead to inclusion in their taxable estate. Furthermore, the death benefit received by the trust is generally income tax-free to the beneficiaries under IRC Section 101(a). ILITs offer asset protection from creditors for the beneficiaries and ensure the life insurance proceeds are managed and distributed according to the grantor's specific instructions, often for liquidity needs or long-term family planning.

Example ($10 Million Assets Over Exemption): An individual with $10 million in assets exceeding their estate tax exemption might purchase a $5 million life insurance policy to provide liquidity for estate taxes or for beneficiaries. If the individual owned this policy, the $5 million death benefit would be added to their already taxable estate, potentially incurring $2 million (40%) in additional estate tax. By contrast, if an ILIT owns the policy, the $5 million death benefit bypasses the taxable estate entirely, saving approximately $2 million in estate taxes. Contributions to the ILIT to pay premiums are considered gifts, which can be offset by annual gift tax exclusions or the grantor's lifetime exemption.

Special Needs Trusts (SNTs) are indispensable legal arrangements designed to hold assets for the benefit of a physically/mentally disabled or chronically ill individual without jeopardizing their eligibility for crucial public assistance benefits such as Supplemental Security Income (SSI) or Medicaid. These trusts come in various forms, including third-party SNTs (funded by someone other than the beneficiary), and first-party SNTs (funded with the beneficiary's own assets, typically established under 42 U.S.C. §1396p(d)(4)(A), commonly known as a "(d)(4)(A) trust"). Properly drafted, an SNT ensures the assets supplement, rather than supplant, government benefits, covering needs not provided by public programs.

Example ($10 Million Assets Over Exemption): A grantor with substantial wealth wants to provide for a disabled child without disqualifying them from Medicaid, which covers medical expenses that could otherwise deplete the family's assets. By placing $2 million into a third-party SNT, these funds can be used for supplemental needs (e.g., therapy not covered, enhanced living conditions). This $2 million is removed from the grantor's taxable estate, preventing potential estate tax at a 40% rate (saving $800,000). Simultaneously, the child receives significant financial support without losing essential public benefits, ensuring long-term care and financial stability that would be jeopardized by direct inheritance.

An Intentionally Defective Grantor Trust (IDGT) is an irrevocable trust designed to be a completed gift for estate tax purposes (removing assets and future appreciation from the grantor's estate) but remain a "grantor trust" for income tax purposes. This unique tax status means the grantor pays the income taxes on the trust's earnings, a payment that is not considered an additional gift to the beneficiaries, as per Revenue Ruling 2004-64. This "tax-free gift" effectively allows the trust assets to grow income tax-free within the trust, leveraging wealth transfer. It "freezes" the value of the gifted assets for estate tax purposes at the time of transfer.

Example ($10 Million Assets Over Exemption): A grantor transfers $10 million in high-growth assets (e.g., a closely held business interest) to an IDGT in exchange for a promissory note. The initial transfer to the IDGT is a completed gift, removing the $10 million plus all future appreciation from the grantor's estate. If the assets grow by 10% annually while the note carries a low interest rate (e.g., the Applicable Federal Rate), the growth above the interest rate accumulates in the IDGT, free of estate tax. For instance, if the trust grows by $1 million in a year, and the grantor pays $300,000 in income tax on that growth from outside the trust, this $300,000 is an additional, tax-free transfer, further reducing the grantor's taxable estate.

A Grantor Retained Annuity Trust (GRAT) is an irrevocable trust where the grantor transfers assets but retains the right to receive fixed annuity payments for a specified term. At term end, any remaining principal passes to beneficiaries free of gift/estate tax. The gift tax value of the remainder is the initial asset value minus the present value of the retained annuity (calculated using the IRC Section 7520 rate). The primary benefit occurs if assets appreciate beyond the 7520 rate; this "excess appreciation" transfers tax-free. GRATs are typically grantor trusts, meaning the grantor pays income tax on trust earnings (Revenue Ruling 2004-64), allowing assets to grow income tax-free for beneficiaries, which is not considered an additional gift. "Zeroed-out" GRATs, validated by Walton v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 589 (2000), structure annuities to virtually eliminate the initial taxable gift, preserving gift tax exemption.

Example ($10 Million Assets Over Exemption): A grantor transfers $10 million in growth stocks to a 2-year GRAT. If the Section 7520 rate is 4.0%, a "zeroed-out" annuity would be approximately $5,301,900 annually. This results in a near-$0 taxable gift. If the stocks appreciate 12% annually, after two years and two annuity payments, approximately $1.5 million (initial appreciation of assets above the annuity return) will remain in the trust for beneficiaries. This $1.5 million passes gift and estate tax-free, saving potentially $600,000 (40% tax rate) compared to a direct gift. The grantor also paid income tax on trust earnings, effectively making another tax-free gift.

A Qualified Personal Residence Trust (QPRT) allows a homeowner to transfer their primary or secondary residence into an irrevocable trust, reserving the right to live in the home for a specified term of years. For gift tax purposes, the value of the gift to the beneficiaries (the remainder interest) is discounted because they will not receive the property until the end of the retained term. The valuation is based on the home's current value, the retained term, and the IRC Section 7520 rate. If the grantor survives the term, the residence, including all future appreciation, is excluded from their taxable estate under IRC Section 2036.

Example ($10 Million Assets Over Exemption): A grantor owns a $10 million residence and transfers it to a QPRT, retaining the right to live there for 15 years. Using the Section 7520 rate of 4.5%, the taxable gift of the remainder interest might be reduced to approximately $4 million (actual calculation depends on exact age, term, and rates). This means the grantor uses only $4 million of their gift tax exemption (or pays gift tax on this amount) for a $10 million asset. If the home appreciates by 3% annually over 15 years, it would be worth over $15.5 million at the end of the term. By removing it from the estate at a $4 million gift value, the grantor potentially avoids estate tax on over $11.5 million of appreciation and current value, saving $4.6 million (40% tax rate) in estate taxes.

A Charitable Remainder Trust (CRT) is an irrevocable trust where the grantor transfers assets, receives an income stream for a term of years or life, and the remaining assets pass to a qualified charity at the end of the term. CRTs are exempt from income tax on capital gains and investment income (IRC Section 664(c)), allowing a trustee to sell highly appreciated, concentrated assets (e.g., closely held stock) without immediate capital gains tax. This facilitates diversification. The grantor receives an immediate income tax deduction for the present value of the charitable remainder interest, determined by IRC Section 7520. The assets placed in the CRT are also removed from the grantor's taxable estate for estate tax purposes.

Example ($10 Million Assets Over Exemption): A grantor holds $10 million in highly appreciated stock with a low cost basis. Selling it personally would trigger a $2 million capital gains tax (20%). Instead, they transfer it to a CRT, which sells the stock tax-free. The CRT then invests the full $10 million. The grantor receives an annuity (e.g., 5% annually) for life, providing a steady income stream. The grantor also gets an immediate income tax deduction, possibly saving $200,000 in income taxes. Crucially, the $10 million asset (and its future growth) is removed from the taxable estate, avoiding a potential $4 million estate tax (40%). This substitutes charitable giving for significant income and estate taxes.

A Charitable Lead Trust (CLT) is an irrevocable trust that makes payments to a qualified charitable organization for a specified term, with the remainder interest passing to non-charitable beneficiaries (often family members) or reverting to the grantor. This effectively allows the grantor to "front-load" their charitable giving while transferring significant wealth to heirs with reduced gift or estate tax. The grantor receives a gift or estate tax deduction for the present value of the income stream paid to charity, calculated using the IRC Section 7520 rate. This reduces the taxable value of the remainder interest passing to non-charitable beneficiaries.

Example ($10 Million Assets Over Exemption): A grantor places $10 million into a CLT for a 10-year term, with an annuity payment of $500,000 per year (5%) to a designated charity. Using a Section 7520 rate of 4.5%, the present value of the charitable interest could be approximately $3.9 million. This $3.9 million is deductible for gift tax purposes. Therefore, for the $10 million transferred, the taxable gift to the family (remainder interest) is only approximately $6.1 million. If the assets grow faster than the 4.5% hurdle rate, say 8% annually, the $10 million could grow to over $14.6 million. After paying $5 million to charity, approximately $9.6 million remains for the family. The actual gift tax was on $6.1 million, saving tax on the difference of $3.5 million, leading to over $1.4 million in estate/gift tax savings.

CLT Variations

The Step [Up Payment] Leads Trust differs from a standard charitable lead annuity trust only in the pattern of its payments to charity. While a standard lead annuity trust makes payments to charity that are the same amount every year, a step lead trust makes payments to charity that increase in steps during the trust term, for example 10%/year. The IRS made clear in Revenue Procedure 2007-45, which provides annotated sample trust instruments for charitable lead annuity trusts created during the donor’s life, that this sort of payment schedule meets the requirements of a charitable lead annuity trust. The IRS reaffirmed its position just recently with a favorable private letter ruling regarding a 10-year testamentary lead annuity trust with payments that will increase 20% each year (PLR 201216045 ). 

The Ballon [Payment] Lead Trust is really just an extreme form of step lead trust: rather than increase its payments at a steady clip over the course of its term, a Balloon Lead Trust makes small payments every year of its term except the last, and then makes a very large payment in its final year. 

It is also possible to structure a Balloon Lead Trust so that it makes large payments over several final years, not just one. In that case, the fin would have a flat top rather than come to a point, and most likely would be shorter, too. 

Note: The notion of having payments increase by no more than 20% each year is considered a “safe harbor” by some practitioners. It derives not from the revenue ruling mentioned earlier, but rather from a ruling relating to the grantor retained annuity trust (GRAT), a popular non-charitable estate planning vehicle that is similar to a charitable lead annuity trust in certain respects (see Treas. Reg. §25.2702-3(b)(1)(ii) ). These planners are concerned that if charitable lead annuity trust payments escalate by more than 20% from any year to the next, such as in the Balloon Lead Trust, the IRS could take exception. The IRS has not ruled specifically on the Balloon Lead Trust.

One way that the lead trust reduces transfer taxes is that any growth in asset value that occurs within the trust is passed on to the trust’s heirs completely free of gift and estate taxes. The more the trust grows, the more the trust transfers to heirs and the more gift and estate taxes may be avoided. Current economic circumstances make it unusually easy to set up a lead annuity trust that is likely to grow in value over its term: 

The potential for asset growth in the long term coupled with the extremely low IRS discount rate has created ideal circumstances under which a charitable lead trust can grow in value over time. The step lead trust and Balloon Lead Trust aim to leverage these benefits even more than a standard charitable lead trust does. Making the payments of the trust lower in its early years (step lead trust) or very low until its final year (Balloon Lead Trust) reduces the effects of poor investment results in the early years, should they occur. Assuming that decent investment results are more certain over the longer term, to differing degrees each approach will tend to allow the accumulation of more assets for the donor's heirs than a straight lead annuity trust would. We should note that while a lead trust can minimize or eliminate gift and estate taxes, it does not avoid capital gains tax. The trust assumes the donor’s cost basis in the funding assets. The trust's ultimate beneficiaries, the donor’s heirs, assume the cost basis of the assets distributed to them from the trust. If the heirs then sell any of these assets, they must pay capital gains tax on the appreciation that has accumulated since the trust - or the donor - acquired them. Estate tax rates currently are much higher than capital gains tax rates (40% versus 23.8%), so for a donor with an estate large enough to owe estate tax, passing on a potential capital gains tax to heirs rather than paying an estate tax should be appealing.

2503(c) Trusts (Minor's Trusts) are designed to allow gifts to minors to qualify for the annual gift tax exclusion (IRC Section 2503(b)) despite being held in trust. To qualify, the trust property and income must be available for the minor's benefit before age 21, and any remaining property and income must pass to the minor at age 21 (or be subject to a general power of appointment by the minor). This provides more control than a custodial account (UTMA) by avoiding direct access at 18. 2642(c) Trusts (Grandchildren's Trusts) are specific types of trusts that can qualify for the Generation-Skipping Transfer (GST) Tax annual exclusion (IRC Section 2642(c)), effectively allowing tax-free gifts to skip generations, circumventing the GST tax typically imposed on such transfers. This is crucial for dynastic wealth transfer.

Example ($10 Million Assets Over Exemption): A grandparent wants to make substantial gifts to several grandchildren, bypassing their children's estates. Instead of direct gifts (which could be subject to GST tax later), they establish a 2642(c) trust for each grandchild. They gift $36,000 annually per grandchild (assuming the $18,000 annual exclusion and gift-splitting). These gifts are GST tax-exempt and do not use up lifetime GST exemption. Over many years, these small, regular contributions can accumulate significantly outside the grandparent's estate. For example, gifting $36,000 annually for 20 years to a trust for one grandchild, growing at 7%, would accumulate approximately $1.47 million for that grandchild, completely free of gift, estate, and GST tax, without ever touching the grandparent's lifetime exemption.

Family Limited Partnerships (FLPs) and Family Limited Liability Companies (FLLCs) are entities that consolidate family wealth under centralized management while facilitating tax-efficient transfers. Their primary tax advantage lies in valuation discounts for gifted interests (limited partner or non-managing member interests). These discounts, typically 15-40%, arise from lack of marketability (no public exchange) and lack of control (limited management rights) over the underlying assets. This reduces the reportable fair market value of the gifted interest for gift tax purposes (IRC Section 2512), allowing transfer of greater economic value with less gift tax liability. They must have a bona fide non-tax purpose and adhere to formalities to avoid IRS challenges under IRC Sections 2036/2038, as highlighted in Estate of Strangi and Kimbell v. U.S. They are generally pass-through entities for income tax.

Example ($10 Million Assets Over Exemption): A grantor transfers $10 million in investment real estate and marketable securities into an FLP. They retain a 1% General Partner interest, gifting a 40% Limited Partner interest to their children. Due to lack of marketability (25%) and lack of control (15%) discounts, the 40% interest, pro-rata worth $4 million, is valued for gift tax purposes at only $2.55 million (after a 36.25% combined discount). This reduces the taxable gift by $1.45 million, potentially saving $580,000 in gift tax (at a 40% rate), while the underlying assets and their future appreciation are removed from the grantor's estate at this reduced value. The grantor maintains control as GP.